7.30-10pm, dorm lobby - pretty fun!
now my annoyance is gone! had fun fun fun watching the candidates talk, act, sing, and dance! the Q&A portion is the most important part. though they weren't concerned mainly of serious topics regarding the university and their GPOAs, it is still interesting to note how they would act in certain situations that caught them off-guard.
the Q&A portion gave no preparation time, it was impromptu. but it was nice. but then, there were some confusing people...confusing candidates evidenced by contradictory statements..(trapo in the making?) i hope not.
the parties were asked regarding their stand for TOFI (tuition and other fee increase) if the majority of the student are pro-TOFI.
a STANDUP candidate said that they will still push for ANTI-TOFI because they believe that it is the correct thing to do even if the majority of the students are for it. then sometime later, the chairperson (Shan) candidate was asked that if ever she's the only one from her party to win and the rest are from other parties, will she push through with her stand & GPOAs? she said that she will do whatever it is for the students even if against her party's will/principles.
SEE? there is INCONSISTENCY! my golly. wer does her loyalty lie? to the students or to her party? maybe that is the question to all the candidates of her party. are they representative of the students or are they an independent body of their own separate from the rest of the students? your basic principles and ethic codes are not certain.
am i the only one confused or did i miss something? no i don't think so.
there is something fishy in there...and gosh darlings, you got a very big hole to cover.
oh yeah, go AISA KING for USC COUNCILOR!
No comments:
Post a Comment